A bank failure occurs when a financial institution becomes insolvent-unable to meet its obligations to depositors and creditors-and is closed by a regulatory authority. Typically, this triggers government intervention to protect insured deposits and maintain public confidence. Unlike temporary liquidity issues, a bank failure signals a complete collapse of the institution's operational viability.
Grasping the mechanics behind bank failures isn't just for economists or Wall Street insiders. In a world shaped by economic shocks, rising interest rates, and global market dependencies, recognizing how and why banks collapse offers clarity. It sharpens the public's financial literacy, informs smarter investment decisions, and underscores the role of regulation in maintaining system stability. When banks fall, ripple effects spread fast-impacting businesses, job markets, and national economies. So, why do some banks crumble while others withstand the pressure?
A bank failure happens when a bank becomes insolvent, meaning it no longer has enough assets to cover its liabilities. At its core, this occurs when depositors demand their money, and the bank doesn't have the funds to meet those requests. This isn't simply a matter of low profits or stock underperformance. A bank fails when it can't meet its obligations to depositors or creditors and regulators step in to close the institution.
Liquidity and solvency play a central role in this outcome. A shortfall in cash (liquidity crisis) might escalate quickly if depositors panic and withdraw funds en masse. If these demands exceed the bank's liquid assets, even a solvent bank can spiral into failure. But if poor asset quality, badly managed risk, or fraud lead to long-term insolvency – the collapse becomes inevitable regardless of liquidity.
When a bank appears to be nearing insolvency, regulatory authorities intervene. In the United States, both federal and state agencies monitor and oversee financial institutions, depending on the type of bank charter and degree of registration. Federal regulators include the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Reserve (Fed), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). State-chartered banks also fall under the supervision of state banking departments.
Here's how the process unfolds:
At this point, the bank's assets are either sold to another institution or liquidated to repay depositors and creditors. Funds are distributed according to a priority hierarchy, with insured depositors at the top.
Bank failure is not spontaneous. It follows a clear pattern: financial distress, regulatory escalation, and eventual intervention. The decision rests on rigorous assessment-not market rumors or temporary downturns. There's a structure to the chaos, designed to protect the financial system from systemic damage.
Leadership failures consistently rank as one of the key drivers behind bank collapses. When bank executives pursue aggressive expansion, ignore risk controls, or overconcentrate in volatile sectors, they jeopardize the institution's solvency. Consider the case of Washington Mutual (WaMu), which failed in 2008. Before its collapse, WaMu pursued rapid growth through high-risk mortgages while sidelining concerns raised by regulators. Its management pushed for loan volume over loan quality-a decision that led directly to its insolvency.
A 2011 Federal Crisis Inquiry Commission report found that "management's appetite for growth and deregulation" fueled risky strategies that ultimately destabilized large banks leading up to the financial crisis. Leadership choices that prioritize short-term profits at the expense of long-term sustainability push institutions over the edge.
When banks weaken lending standards, defaults increase. Poor credit decisions reduce asset quality-creating cascading effects across balance sheets. One clear example can be drawn from the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s. Deregulation allowed institutions to engage in commercial real estate lending without adequate oversight. Many extended loans to borrowers lacking the capacity to repay, and roughly 1,043 thrifts failed between 1986 and 1995, according to data published by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
Recessions expose and accelerate underlying fragilities. During economic contractions, commercial lending slows, loan defaults rise, and asset valuations fall-straining a bank's balance sheet. Following the 2007-2009 recession, 489 banks failed in the U.S., a 30-year high. In 2010 alone, 157 institutions shut down, driven largely by the burst of the housing bubble and subsequent rise in non-performing loans.
Even regional slowdowns can have disproportionate impacts. For instance, oil-price volatility led to banking pressure in heavily energy-dependent areas such as Texas and North Dakota during the 2015-2016 downturn. Banks heavily invested in local energy assets and businesses found themselves exposed to unsustainable losses.
Liquidity (the ability of a bank to meet short-term obligations) is a non-negotiable pillar of bank stability. When depositor confidence falls, even solvent banks can plunge into crisis due to sudden withdrawals. This phenomenon, known as a bank run, famously contributed to the downfall of Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023. After revealing a $1.8 billion loss on securities sales, SVB faced over $42 billion in withdrawal requests in a single day, draining its liquidity.
Liquidity shortfalls compounded by lack of access to emergency funding sources force banks to close or seek shotgun mergers. The 2008 collapse of IndyMac Bank is another case in point: it couldn't cover withdrawals after depositors, rattled by public reports, withdrew billions within days. The FDIC, at the time, labeled it the fourth-largest bank failure in U.S. history.
On March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was shut down by California regulators and taken over by the FDIC. With $209 billion in assets and $175 billion in deposits, it became the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. SVB's collapse unfolded over just 48 hours, triggered by a concentrated depositor base of venture capital-backed clients and a sudden run fueled by digital banking and social media panic.
SVB had invested heavily in long-term U.S. Treasury bonds during a low-interest-rate environment. When the Federal Reserve raised rates aggressively in 2022 and 2023, the value of those bonds dropped sharply. The bank faced $1.8 billion in losses from securities sales and attempted a $2.25 billion capital raise, which spooked clients. In a single day-March 9-depositors withdrew $42 billion. The bank couldn't recover liquidity fast enough, and the doors closed the next morning.
On September 25, 2008, Washington Mutual (WaMu), which had over $307 billion in assets and $188 billion in deposits, was seized by the Office of Thrift Supervision. It was then sold to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion, marking the largest bank failure in U.S. banking history. The collapse occurred during the subprime mortgage crisis, where WaMu had aggressively expanded its mortgage lending, often extending loans to unqualified borrowers without verifying income.
Losses soared as defaults mounted. Depositors, sensing trouble, withdrew $16.7 billion in just 10 days . This liquidity crisis made the bank insolvent. The FDIC didn't face insurance losses, but the event punctuated the systemic risk posed by over-leveraged institutions and poor lending standards.
In 1984, Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company failed with $40 billion in assets-rendering it the seventh-largest U.S. bank at the time. It had purchased energy loans from Penn Square Bank, most of which turned sour during the early 1980s oil bust. The bank's deteriorating loan book, combined with risk mismanagement, led to massive losses and mounting withdrawals from depositors.
The FDIC stepped in with a $4.5 billion bailout, protecting all depositors, including those above the insurance limit. 11 bank executives were removed, and the bank survived under government oversight for years. This case introduced the terminology "too big to fail" into banking discourse and shaped future policy frameworks around systemic risk.
Though not a commercial bank, Lehman Brothers' failure on September 15, 2008, had a seismic impact on global banking. As a major investment bank with $639 billion in assets, it held significant exposure to complex mortgage-backed securities. Lacking depositor insurance or central bank access, Lehman's liquidity evaporated when investor confidence vanished. With no buyer and no government bailout, bankruptcy was the only option.
The firm's collapse sparked widespread contagion, nearly freezing credit markets worldwide. Unlike WaMu or SVB, Lehman didn't have FDIC involvement due to its status outside traditional banking, highlighting the gaps in regulatory oversight during the financial crisis.
When regulators assess financial institutions now, they draw directly from these examples. Each failure shaped post-crisis tools, from stress testing to resolution planning. Bank failures aren't just stories of misfortune; they are case studies written into the framework of modern banking regulation.
Bank failures can be unpredictable, but your financial security doesn’t have to be.
Ampersand, Inc. is not a bank. Instead, we work with a carefully vetted network of FDIC-insured institutions to help you safely allocate funds across multiple accounts, protecting your full balance, not just the first $250,000.
Explore how Ampersand helps you bank smarter—without being a bank. Contact us today
